Deconstruction is a term rarely immediately understood. The film Deconstruction will help with that understanding, but in the meantime, the term is used to enlighten one glaring truth: almost all institutions, both here in the US and internationally, are corrupt. The level of corruption is to such a degree that tinkering around with language or any given policy to reform them is useless. They must be deconstructed, torn down to their fundamental elements and either destroyed or rehabilitated.
The powers that have corrupted these organizations and institutions are such that little can be done to bring them back to their stated goals and purposes within the natural processes of bureaucracy. It cannot be done by internal fiddling about. Specifically, the United Nations was designed to forestall any future world war by giving a forum to all of those concerned with growing aggression of any given nation an opportunity to enlighten other, more distant nations to the danger and build a coalition against it.
Where it has gone wrong, from the perspective of the film, is that it has allowed coalitions of powerful nations to force all nations into a compliance protocol and has been, by virtue of billionaire influences in varied national politics, centered that effort on censorship, forced illegal immigration and surveillance on the premise of kindness. USAID was a large part of the funding mechanism by which color revolutions could be funded in nations that did not conform to the Green New Deal policies against the hoax of global warming.
The crucial understanding here is that billionaires don’t spend their own money on these schemes, they use their clout funding politicians who will carry the water for them in these international organizations and pry from the combined treasuries the funds to support Non Governmental Organizations (NGOs) who, as the film shows, partake in riots, protests and election-rigging to arrive at the far leftist goals of the billionaires.
It is the identical playbook as employed by the EU, except that the EU is much more adept at using the trade coalition, which is all it was intended to be, before the communists discovered the power available through sanctions against member states, most glaringly against Hungary. And it has warped itself into a political superpower.
The danger of this to the American citizen, is that many of these EU nations are also members of NATO and where the EU has recently threatened to use NATO against the US over the prospect of annexing Greenland, shows the hubris with which they routinely operate. This is particularly true, because the majority of funding and military equipment is provided by the US.
Despite the fact that few would view the efforts of the EU and the UN as an attempt to produce something akin to conditions under the Soviet Union for the citizens of their member states, the speeches by Javier Milei of Argentina suggest something very similar.
What is missing in this assessment of the true conditions of citizens under the control of the EU and to some extent the UN, is that there are no secret police roaming about in black sedans or infiltrating popular gatherings to listen in on conversations of regular citizens for criticisms for which they can be punished. That missing element isn’t really missing, it’s replaced by the vulnerability of phones, internet connections, even televisions to do the eavesdropping of governments worldwide under the guise of anti-terrorism legislation. Flock cameras fit right into this government paranoia. The real question is: what are the world governments doing to cause such grave and pervasive paranoia? What are they afraid of?
The answer is freedom. They so fear the freedom of the people to criticize them for what they’re doing: forcing indigenous populations to suffer the cultural conflicts of their policies, spreading the truth of the rapes and murders that accompany these forced illegal migrations, that they feel the need to monitor every form of human expression and punish those who refuse to repeat the state propaganda. That all sounds awfully Soviet to me. That the evidence is procured passively rather than actively seems like a difference without a distinction.
What is the purpose of forcing illegals into exclusively Western democracies and republics? It seems quite clear from the evidence uncovered in the film that the purpose is to prevent the conservative message of limited government and freedom of the people, including freedom of speech, from determining the political makeup of these nations. It’s a grandiose scheme to replace one voting block with another. To the extent that we’ve seen this in the US in Minnesota and Michigan it’s quite jarring.
What is apparent is that these are the acts of racists, who believe that White Europeans must be eradicated from their once majority white nations. That Islamists who share a common ideal of total submission with communists can be a weapon against the radical idea of freedom for the average citizen. This is why the film attempts to show the global fight for freedom taking place in different nations scattered across the globe, a growing coalition that has suffered some losses in recent months, but that continues to inspire people to vote for non-conformist, populist and even nationalist leaders like Milei, Bukele, Nawrocki, Fico, Babis and more.
In all candor and disclosure our parent company 12 Round Productions produced the film because it is that important for all of us to realize we are not the only ones fighting for freedom against these organized forces, it’s a global effort that needs global support.
12 Round Productions has released through Salemnow.com Deconstruction: The Global Fight for Freedom. This was by far the most expensive film we have ever undertaken, calling for us to travel to Budapest, Hungary, Warsaw, Poland, Brussels, Belgium, and a few cities in the US (Los Angeles and Tallahassee) to get the interviews. We filmed the Nick Searcy footage in Los Angeles in a set designed and created for the purpose.
We recognize that this film requires a rental or subscription, but the greater share of those funds return directly to the producers for now.
Mr. Davis, thank you for bringing this to the light of day for the many who will view this film. At some point regular folks, men and women, will stand and unleash their fury which civilization and an unjust "justice" system has prevented them from acting sooner to set things right. Good Lord willing, I will close ranks with them when it happens.