Dire Times
The US is being colonized and the colonizers are being cheered on by those who claim to detest colonization. It’s like the police officer in Dallas, TX, who threatened to arrest a pastor for preaching aloud, if it upset some local Muslims, but when asked, the police refused to arrest the Muslims threatening the pastor. This is systematic profiling, where if one race or religion does it, it’s fine, but if another does it, it’s a crime.
This is not justice. This is not how a constitutional republic is supposed to work. This is not the rule of law, this is the rule of man, of each individual being arrested or assisted based on their race, religion or political affiliation, only this time, it’s the Western population, the previous colonizers, if you will, those who have been here for generations and centuries that are victimized by their own system.
Don’t pretend that only white people are being hurt in this systematic forced acceptance of Islam. The diversity of the United States, once proudly announced as E Pluribus Unum, or Out of Many, One, will not find itself diverse, anymore. It will be absolutely, solidly Muslim. For the most part, it’s the blacks, Asians and Hispanics that are most likely to suffer the brunt of being forced into Islam. Asians have already, in China and Japan, rejected Islam and prefer their own culture, as any sane nation would.
White insanity is the problem here, white stupidity and we’re letting everyone down. It was the promise of America to maintain a land where hard work and dedication could provide a good living, a good education and with those things build a good, independent life, one not owed to some ruling earl or lord, some landed-gentry who decided who would profit and who would be impoverished.
It is not a hatred for Islam or Muslims; have we not tolerated them along with all other religions, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, etc.? But what we are witnessing is not tolerance, but subjection. No other religion asks of its Christian neighbors to hide their dogs, cover their women, refrain from BBQ and bacon. None other demands to spread their daily prayers into the air, much worse than a preacher on a street corner, for the call to prayer reaches out miles from the source to annoy and antagonize the Christian population. When are Muslims ticketed for violations of the sound ordinances? What other American could so blatantly defy the powers of government or even an HOA with such impunity?
On one side, we have an organized and taught invasion strategy, a strategy that has worked in every nation, except perhaps China and Japan. The initial adherents obey the local laws, fit into society and begin to push the boundaries from inside. In time, especially with democratic-type systems, the Muslims insert politicians who work to change the laws to comport to Islam, to claim prejudice and demand protection. Until Islam gains enough political power to unleash the full strength of Sharia on the entire population.
We are in this phase of colonization. Cities are created that are only for Muslims and Sharia compliant as in Little Rock, Arkansas. This is what they used to take over Dearborn, MI as well as Iran, Egypt, Lebanon. They will go block by block, voting district by voting district so it’s easy to minimize and overlook. They understand they just need to take over the population centers to rule the state. They’re probably just following a strategy first worked out by the Vatican.
It’s not that what they are doing that is wrong. They’re called to establish the worldwide caliphate on earth, as Jesus sent his disciples to all the nations of the earth to bring the word of God to the people.
The one and only objection that I, and most of the Western world has, is that it is, and will be, forced conversion, that an American citizen is not allowed to pursue their own happiness in the face of Sharia law. That political divisions are created within the overall structure with different laws, different rules of behavior. It’s an overthrow of the American system of freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of movement, freedom of thought and expression. That it allows what we find abominable, such as pedophilia and the subjugation of women and punishment of women outside the rule of law established by the constitution of the United States. Where women and girls can be stoned to death for what we would consider minor moral lapses. It’s a rejection of thousands of years of civilization and a return to the brutality and patriarchy of the past.
The leftists encourage, support and give aid to these enemies of freedom as a strategic move by the communists who cannot rely on the religious zealousness of communism to enforce their fascist agenda (yes, that is intentional) and substitute Islam for that zeal to conquer the West. The communists will purge as they need to after the collapse of the West, or, at least, they have convinced themselves. I doubt it.
America is in a vice of these two powers. Zohran Mamdani embodies the whole strategy in one of the largest and most powerful cities in the world.
This is exactly what the Second Amendment was drafted for, the purpose of militias described in the constitution. The purpose of a militia, by the way, is so that whatever is needed it is done through recognition of the laws and rights of others, it is to discourage vigilante justice.
When a local government has become hostile to its citizens, has allowed invaders to take possession of United States territory, substituting and subjecting the population to foreign laws, the militia, being armed as well as any government troops (they are not, because the legal system infringed the right to keep and bear arms egregiously and often) are entitled to stand as protectors of the constitution.
This is not meant to encourage anyone to do anything against anyone else, but there is fundamental, legal support for it, that in normal times would be unnecessary and unwanted. What we, Americans, have enjoyed for the majority of our existence is a peaceful and orderly society supported by the laws we made through the representatives we’ve chosen. That is no longer the case. It simply is not. Where Islam establishes itself, it unwrites the laws of the Untied States and the several states of which it is established, and inserts a set of laws unrecognized by the United States and the several states of which is is established.
No current politician will support the idea of militias to enforce the laws of the United States against the invasion of Islam and its desire to convert the population and enforce Sharia law. They are too cowardly to look at the constitution in that frame of mind. The principles of the United States have already been diluted by the corrupt and cowardly. We cannot go back and undo that history, but we can forge the future.
People forget the world in which the United States was born. It was an infant in a world of great and powerful nations. The invasion by Spain, Britain or France was a real threat. These powers shared common borders with the thirteen colonies newly freed. The Second Amendment was to protect those borders with whatever the population could muster. This was true in the frontier where for nearly a hundred years small militia forces were required to prevent incursions against the settlers. And, by all rights, the Indian nations had every legal and moral right to defend the land they had claimed. But it extended mostly against those great powers, who often enlisted the Indian nations to support their wars against the fledgling republic.
My point is simply that we are in the grips of two equally powerful entities working together to obliterate both Christianity and the constitution of the United States of America. It is our duty, however detested by the agents of these powers, i.e., the police forces, the sheriffs, the state and federal houses and senates that we established, fund and protect every day with our tax dollars. They are corrupt and instead of helping to establish these militias will work diligently to infiltrate and destroy them.
The Second Amendment does not secure the right to shoot targets, it secures the right of the people to defend the constitution, their land and their religion.
Become a paid subscriber and join the conversation. Currently $5 per month or $30 per year.
In order to offer my subscribers a further benefit, please use the discount code “subscriber” for a secret 30% off the paperback versions at Twelveround.com. This discount will not be advertised, this is the only way to get it, but you can offer it to friends and family.
Twelveround.com is still the home of quality fiction with 60-70% 5-star ratings. If Westerns, Shadow Soldier, Home to Texas and Into Exile aren’t your thing, Rebel and Rogue are more modern (1970s) If you don’t want to buy from Amazon or have them in e-book format, you can get the physical novels from Twelveround for the above discount.



I have thought for some time that eventually we will have to add Islam to the "terrorist organization to be erased" list.
Yes, I know we have that 1st Amendment right to freedom of religion, but does that include religions like Nuestra Señora de la Santa Muerte?
https://nuestrasenoradelanoche.org/2022/06/14/the-most-holy-death-santa-muerte/
And Voodoo?
What about the old Aztec religion? https://www.livescience.com/59514-cultures-that-practiced-human-sacrifice/2.html
These 30 African tribal religions? https://www.discoverwalks.com/blog/africa/30-unique-african-traditional-religions-that-will-blow-your-mind/
These 25 that practiced human sacrifice? https://www.livescience.com/59514-cultures-that-practiced-human-sacrifice.html
We already regulate genital mutilation and honor killing, so what about a religious practice like Sharia. One that's dedicated to killing us all?
I can hear the screams of outrage at this idea, and much of it will come from those who would happily eradicate both Judaism AND Christianity. "Oh, but all Muslims aren't terrorists". Maybe not, but they all allow it, tolerate it, or indirectly support it... and how do you tell the difference?
It's the same as the jellybean problem, and both have only one sure solution.
"Only some of them are poisoned- don't worry about it."
No, the answer is don't swallow it
Eventually I think this question will be settled in the old fashion way, the way- the way Muslims prefer to settle it. As the old saying goes, "Not by who is right, but by who is left".
Until the Supreme Court majority ruled, 5 - 4, as it did in the birthright case, I held hope that First Amendment would be able to withstand its abuse by Muslims. By abuse I mean for Muslims to take advantage of, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..." The First Amendment was written to alleviate the conflict that lay between Christian sects. There had been much bloodshed over religious wars in Europe and which religion was to be the state religion in a particular country. The struggle in England between the Catholics and Protestants resulted in death, privation, and not a few nobles being beheaded. The First Amendment was to ensure there would be no American national/state religion or dominant sect. Before the Bill of Rights was added in 1791, the Philadelphia Constitution did not specifically prohibit a "national religion." However, an underlying principle of government, federalism, was built in. Federalism and its operative design limited federal/national government power to a few enumerated powers. See Article I Section 8 of the US Constitution. James Madison wrote in Federalist #45, "The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State." Therefore, states could have their own state religion if the people of the state chose. My point is that Federalism was intended to allow states and locales to self-govern.
Then, in 1791 the Bill of Rights was added. Again, it was intended to prevent religious conflict between and among Christians. However, with current contemporary intellectual laziness, (some use the term conventional wisdom but it is neither conventional nor wise), there will be, there is, an enormous level of tolerance that would/will/does allow Muslims to use the 1st Amend. as a legal shield to force Americans, Christians, to tolerate and accept small, issues of Islam that are of little concern, initially. As so many today think it would seem right to do so. As time passes what begins as requests, small inconveniences, become demands and as their numbers increase, so will the demands to allow and then require Sharia law recognition in public. There is a provision in Sharia that allows Muslims to lie in order to deceive infidels, Christians. I believe there are many Muslim immigrants who only seek to live and let live. But there are many hardliners who will not. Our women, wives, mothers, daughters, nieces, grandmothers and granddaughters will be grateful for our prevention of "Shariaization." of America. It is already happening in some schools in the USA. So, I hold little out little hope that the 1st Amend. will be properly applied.