Lies We Tell Ourselves

The amazing part of communism is the ability to exert the most ridiculous statements oblivious of the irony or hypocrisy involved. It’s as if they assume that whatever they say will be given equal weight with obvious truths and common sense, when most of their statements are in conflict with both.

In recognizing the dogma surrounding this, it isn’t so much that they put exaggerated lies forward as the truth, but that they seem to garner so many listeners. One must stand back and marvel, not at the lies or liars involved, but those who stand ready to accept it, drink it in as if able to sustain life itself. The craft that enables this sort of magic, or instant brainwashing, is fascinating to me. These are the dark arts of manipulation.

I read somewhere that the ability to manipulate whole groups of people had been developed long ago as part of a mind-control exercise. It’s akin to alchemy in that respect. Common knowledge associates this method with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), but they got it from somewhere. One might suggest that early practitioners were people like Merlin or Rasputin, who may have stumbled on the method by chance or instruction. Magicians must practice some aspect of it.

The desire to extend the boundaries to whole populations consumes most governments. It was a driving force in early communism. Those who cannot be fooled must be eliminated or imprisoned to keep their abilities to resist hidden from other, more willing subjects. That’s why those who rejected the vaxx were demonized and confronted with some form of punishment, either ostracization or imprisonment. It was the most clear-cut example of how communistic our governments were at all levels that startled me, but much more startling was the willingness and obedience my fellow Americans were to the manipulation. Whether that was coerced by regulatory bodies or not, there was substantial evidence that what they were doing was absolutely outside of any precepts to freedom or rule of law.

The only other experience I had had with such behavior was as a young Airman in Tech School when our squadron commander issued an obviously illegal order that I was not going to obey, yet saw so many of my fellow classmates were eager to comply. It was confusing, because we had just come out of Basic Training where we were all well-versed on illegal orders and the proper response, which was to refuse to obey. Let it go to courts martial, if they wanted to push it that far. I personally think it was a test to see how many complied, except that there was no inspection to discover the percentage one way or another. There was just an apology for having issued an illegal order and an instruction that we didn’t have to comply, which was good, because I didn’t.

The reason this is so mystifying and why I have considerable doubts about my fellow Americans, is that to comply with such orders, or admonitions, is a willing relinquishment of freedom, of liberty, of the rule of law that all civilians are themselves subject to at all times. It was all a test: the masks, the distancing (which I had no problem with, because I don’t care for people violating my personal space anyway), the irrational compliance by medical professionals that had to know the masks didn’t work and that distancing was nonsense, that the illness itself was little more than an inconvenience, but they treated it like a serious threat to human life. As if failure to comply with the idiocy would actually cost someone their life. To believe any of this is to lie to oneself.

With all we know now, there are still those determined to follow the “rules” however arbitrary or in violation of common sense. It signals, to me, that too many of my fellow Americans have no clue as to what being American means, what behavior is supposed to accompany that designation.

In a variation of Beria’s famous quote: “Show me the law and I’ll show you where the government violates it.” Americans are supposed to be hostile toward laws, even if passed by elected representatives, they must clear another hurdle before they accept it, the Constitution. Not so much the actual document, but the theory and spirit of it. The truths that form our understanding of the relationship between us as individuals and it, as a blood-thirsty villainous group of usurpers, who, without a darn good and logical reasons easily understandable by personal experience, have no right to impose anything on us.

Obviously, laws respecting theft, murder, rape etc., fall into that category. Lying to a police officer does not. I have a right to speak and if he asks me to incriminate myself in violation of the 5th Amendment, I have no obligation to oblige him. The preferred method is to remain silent, but if I lie, I do not commit a crime. I commit an immorality, because I am not under oath when I lie to the cop, I just add an extra hurdle to his ability to prove I broke the law. I feel no obligation to make that task easier by ratting on myself. When I do speak to a cop, it’s merely to challenge his presumption, his perspective.

Lying, is between me and God and the cop is not God. That’s why the invocation of swearing on the Bible is supposed to mean something and why the republic, as designed, is unsuited to any other than a devoutly Christian people. Swearing on a Bible, then committing the sin of deception violates the very soul of one’s faith and forces them to accept the earthly punishment for telling the truth rather than face the wrath of God, to whom one is lying under that scenario.

This is also why Islam does not fit, cannot be accommodated in the United States. They have several exceptions to the truth that can be employed under Sharia Law. Constitutional law does not. This is a hurdle that cannot be cleared and will likely, in time, lead to civil war. All those who propose that Islam can be integrated into this nation are, in fact, encouraging civil war, because they make it inevitable. Already, some towns and cities fly the Palestinian flag or have changed their flag to represent Islam. Any patriot must find that unacceptable and a direct challenge to the sovereignty of the United States, because it is. It isn’t just a religious thing, but it involves religion, because for a Muslim state to exist in America, the citizens thereof must denounce their religion as well as accept a foreign form of government and legal standard.

The question is not “is it legal” to attack these outposts of a foreign people self-admittedly intent on the destruction of the United States from within, the “domestic enemies” of the Constitution. The question is, would the founders recognize this as an internal insurrection or not? I believe those willing to go to war to establish the territorial control under the Constitution of the vast territories of the United States would. Maybe that’s just me. Our government no longer reflects the spirit of the Constitution, so they accept this assault on its precepts. The bureaucratic dictatorship would not allow Americans to expel these would-be conquerors, but they are not Americans, either. They follow the communist ideology of the all-powerful state. But somewhere along the timeline, the people will have to fight for themselves and the safety of their families. The government won’t even tell the truth about the dangers of these domestic enemies. They pretend that the statistics are mere anomalies, despite the fact that they remain constant.

It seems that everyone wants to conquer the United States, because it is weak. It doesn’t adhere to its own precepts; it doesn’t take treason particularly serious; it doesn’t defend itself from invasion; it doesn’t have the will to defend itself and actually plays a supporting role to its enemies. But we are the people who will suffer the most from their treachery and somewhere along that timeline is the moment when the people will have to recognize they are separate from the government and that the government despises them and encourages all manner of people willing to kill them and breed them out of existence. If that is not reason enough to rebel, it will be conquered, but I will not be conquered along with it.

There is no inflation at TL’s Posts and Podcasts. Even though my costs have gone up, I have not and, for the foreseeable future, will not raise subscription rates. Currently $5 per month or $30 per year.

In order to offer my subscribers a further benefit, please use the discount code “subscriber” for a secret 30% off the paperback versions at Twelveround.com. This discount will not be advertised, this is the only way to get it, but you can offer it to friends and family.

Twelveround.com is still the home of quality fiction with 60-70% 5-star ratings. If Westerns, Shadow Soldier, Home to Texas and Into Exile aren’t your thing, Rebel and Rogue are more modern (1970s) If you don’t want to buy from Amazon or have them in e-book format, you can get the physical novels from Twelveround for the above discount.