A battle for the U.S., perhaps a full blown war, is shaping up. If one reads enough history and especially military history, even the campaigns against the Indians, there is a moment when the facts all align in opposition and it’s clear that there are no means of resolving the deep-seated animosities other than surrender or complete annihilation of one side or the other. I believe that America is proportionally divided into those who generally believe in the virtues of the foundation of the country or that is was always conceived in evil. That is no little thing in a nation supposedly united.
I prefer a fight to the slavish recitation of lies, like “diversity is our strength.” When you’re attracting the best and the brightest that might be true, not when your incentivizing the worst and the vilest. It is at once a cynical debasement of the population on whom they have little pity when inflicting the sort of pain “the green new deal” and other grandiose liberal disasters are sure to produce, and an attempt at genocide of the white race through violence or breeding. Anyone who does not see this desire to eradicate whiteness across the world, not just the United States, is either blind or an idiot.
It’s not even that historical immigration patterns haven’t swept away one race or another, been conquered and dominated by one religion or another, at certain times of military imbalance, or a need to settle vast empty lands. It has never happened before to the military superior nations. That can only come out of internal corruption and deceit. The United States grew out of the normal that cycle and endured several more after its establishment, there were floods of people from Europe and Asia. This is different, this is a forced migration of people from one country into the Western democracies for the purpose of diversification, the goal, ironically, is homogenization of an African or Middle-Eastern nature and the absence of whiteness. What was wrong with the nations that are being overrun? It’s hard to see it as anything other than punishment for not willingly adopting the New World Order of global governance and selected leaders from the basket of those now occupying places like the UN, Davos or the Bohemian Grove.
The excuse for global government is an end to war, but war is not the most efficient or cost-effective means of population control, which the globalists insist is their purview, somehow gleaned from the stars or tea leaves, because a sense of “democracy” does not exist in their charter. They have the money, the positions and the jets, so they get to make the rules. If there is a fight left in the American people it should be against such notions of might makes right.
The United States government is most worried about their own people, labeling them terrorists for believing in, guess what? The founding of the United States government. If that doesn’t tell one that the nation has been overthrown already and they are being loyal to a governmental structure that no longer exists, I don’t know what will. If one will be honest, the only semblance of American life that remains is that of the control structures. Everything else, all of the democratic functions have been given to the bureaucrats. Nothing speaks to this more astutely than the way the elections are run (the only democratic part of American life). Instead of paper ballots and hand delivery to the ballot box, they are all now somewhat electronically tainted and the glaring evidence of elitist control is in the marked inefficiency of these elections. Since 2000, it seems that elections that are close or go the Democrat (globalist) direction are fraught with delays and extra secret counting rooms where view of their machinations are blocked or the monitors evacuated before the big ballot dumps occur. The Republican victories immediately attacked and vilified until they can be overcome.
To be honest, elections have always been a problem. As far back as one might want to look in American history, there have been those who understood that it is not whose votes that count, but rather who counts the votes. I recently read about an election to determine the county seat of a given area that took place in the early 1900s. It took three rounds before they settled on a permanent decision with midnight raids on the vying town’s offices and a stolen vault before it was done. At other times, corruption was so bad in oil and mining towns that whole county commissions and police forces had to be taken into custody by vigilantes or the National Guard.
We should now be able to agree that the national election process in America has broken down, that it needs the equivalent of mass arrests, perhaps even by the military. One possible solution is to elect Trump and have his DOJ tenaciously prosecute those who engage in election rigging, no matter how slight or inconsequential, but that relies on the broken system to correct the broken system and is unlikely to succeed.
My concerns about this are secondary to the idea that there will be some massive attack on the homeland that will set the nation ablaze. This might come from Russia or China through troops that have come over the porous southern border, or directly in the form of nuclear engagement. The understanding that one will be drafted into local militias required to secure the homeland from these alien (human) attacks is almost a given at present. All of our powerful law enforcement will fail its duty to defend the land, because they don’t have the will (again DEI) or manpower to do so.
DEI, as we saw during the assassination attempt of Donald Trump, is the means by which the attention is focused on everything except national defense. A nation so unconcerned by actual threats such as terrorism and more concerned with an individual’s acceptance of ludicrous lies means that it is already defunct and the degree to which it still functions is a testament of the people’s ability to be autonomous. The government, especially during the lack of leadership during the Biden Administration, has done nothing over the past several years than proclaim its own uselessness. Were it all to disintegrate tomorrow, the people themselves would, as always before, take care of their own personal needs as human beings. It would be ugly for a while, but it’s ugly now.
Our future is one that is sad and dismal, because of the two options available to the American people. It is either existence under total control through electronic means and a reduction of the population on a global and biblical scale or individual survival in the absence of modern notions of running water, sewer systems and grocery stores. The reestablishment of such only to be attributed to consolidated groups of local fighters. Later on, we might get some semblance of government back, if that’s seen as a desire, but more likely it will be seen as the cause of our distress. Our concern for foreign invasion from other nations will probably cease to be a concern, because once the United States is reduced to localized bands of fighters, it will bring down the economic status of enemy nations. Take the economic strength of America out of the global demand equation and the stabilizing nature of one of the world’s greatest militaries and smaller scale wars erupt across the globe.
China might appear to be a strong, independent nation, but it’s not. It’s dependence on the United States as a market for its goods and investments, the stability of its own political status dependent upon having the United States as a threat to validate the expenditures on their military and it is much more likely that when the United States devolves into a highly reduced threat, the war between Russia and China or a Chinese civil war is imminent.
China and other nations might be betting on winning the internal conflict with the Americans, now that we’ve allowed so many of their soldiers into our nation, but that also would seem to preclude the nuclear option while they still feel that conquer is possible. Who wants to rule over glowing radiation rather than plush fields and natural resources? How soon after China conquers the United States does a similar civil war erupt with the Islamists, or what’s left of them?
The only possible middling survival of America as it exists today is a recognition of the largest states that the United States Government is incapable or unwilling to defend the nation from these attacks and choose secession or a coalescing of them to defy the most dangerous aspects of a government determined on national suicide. In other words, the states have to forcefully defend the rights they maintain today, but prosecute them with a strident sense of purpose. The states are the rightful overseers of the federal, created by them for their protection, but if that protection is not foremost in the federal structure, then it is the states themselves who are capable of redesigning the federal duties or abolishing them all together. If I can see this, surely they must.
12 Round Productions is the overall company under which this blog exists. There has been some confusion when subscriptions have been billed, because they don’t mention Substack itself. Subscriptions to 12 Round Productions are to this blog and allow me to keep up the company website and to spread the word for freedom and justice. I thank all of the new subscribers and those who consider a paid subscription to it.
Our son told us about a theory that when a nation is dying, its attention is focused on incidentals such as green energy, diversity, etc. We are a post industrial nation, we shipped most of our manufacturing overseas and dress up this destruction by saying that we are more ecologically conscious now. The thing that really frightens me is that the knowledge of how to actually make things is being lost. My husband is literally a mine of information on the wire making process. But just before the place where he worked closed down, they sent ALL the secrets of manufacturing that the company had accumulated over a century over to China. The awful thing was that the owner of the company (it had been a family concern) had no children who wanted to take over the business (his son was a homo and his daughter was simply uninterested), and he offered to let the workers buy the place. My husband was the ONLY one who pushed for this, but he got mocked, they said he just wanted to be the big boss, which he didn't. Then they whined that the didn't have salesmen, and he said, we hire them like our former boss did, but they wouldn't go for it. We might actually have wound up as millionaires, rather than scrabbling along on Social Security since the new owners looted the pension fund totally. Not to mention the disgrace of an American company founded by a man and woman working together was sold to a foreign enemy. Sic transit gloria mundi.
Another very good article by T.L. Davis. I do disagree with some terms like "race". Human beings are all of the same race. This idea of race was invented by the Darwin/Eugenicists to make the elites have a "natural" reason for their "superiority."
Humans have different cultures and are in different tribes. They have different physical characteristics due to the climate where they have lived for millenia.
Nations are a recent invention of man. Tribes and cultures have been around since the beginning of man.
Nations can come and go, but tribes and cultures last as long as the tribe exists. For example, the Romans wiped out the Carthaginians just like the Europeans wiped out the Tasmanians. Their tribes and cultures no longer exist.
American Indians still exist as does their culture. The same can be said for the Irish even though they are all over the world. Same for the Jews.
Personally, I think the days of the Nation-State are coming to an end.
PS: I am 3/4s through reading "Shadow Soldier" by T.L. Davis. The book is excellent.