21 Comments

On 9/11 I wept, on Jan 6th I was absent, ..... How many of We/Me/You were also absent???

Not to chastise, but to extrapolate the numbers .... for every One in DC on Jan 6th, How many of Us back home did They represent??? more like 75 million.

The DC Feral Coupists are overwhemingly outnumbered, even by our 2nd Amendment numbers.

and We have an Additional 3 years of Experienced DC Feral Tyranny and Invasion now.

https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1745175366610645398?

Expand full comment

Thanks for another good read. I’m currently reading Andrew Isker’s The Boniface Option. Between dilution and the success the elites have had in isolating us from each other it will be very difficult to put together a group of folks to just defend each other. From his perspective that’s why we are still allowed weapons. Very few are willing to sacrifice themselves for a higher purpose. Sad.

Expand full comment
Jan 14Liked by T.L. Davis

Concisely articulated good sir! Ordered all your books!

Expand full comment
Jan 14Liked by T.L. Davis

Patrick Henry's home place and burial plot is a modest drive from me. Some nights I almost can hear him spinning in his grave. Thomas Jefferson's Monticello is not too far, either. His Summer home, Popular Forest is only 20 minutes away. Appomattox is just a modest drive down Rt. 460E. Stonewall Jackson has been eliminated from VMI and the town of Lexington, Va. I can no longer be proud of calling myself an American. I don't know what that is any longer. I really can't even claim to be a Virginian since Northern Va. is just a bedroom community for D.C. and the Tidewater area is governed by leftists... many of which are arrogant Jews. So what am I? I'm a patriot. I'm a back woods Blue Ridge Mountain redneck. I am hard headed. I am stubborn. I am contrary to authority. I am a renegade. I am a maverick. I will give you my honest opinion, and if you don't like it you shouldn't have asked! I intend to ride this thing out, and I will not bend the knee. I pray the rest of you will do the same.

Expand full comment

Apparently, it’s just more security theatre, it has no real effect and does not change the situation: “Yet despite the addition of personnel, barriers, gates, concertina wire, and “military Humvees” to the area, Abbott has not authorized the Texas National Guard to detain and deport illegal immigrants, who are still being turned over to Border Patrol for processing and, in most cases, release.” https://thefederalist.com/2024/01/12/texas-stages-more-border-security-theater-with-national-guards-eagle-pass-seizure/

Texas is still surrendering its sovereignty and control of its borders to the Feds, who continue on as before. If this were real, it would be a significant change, but the Republicans have shown time and again that they will bow to the Democrats, follow their party line, and lose, lose, lose – but gracefully.

Expand full comment
Jan 16Liked by T.L. Davis

Talent brings talent. A culture that values talent and the cultivation of that talent as one if its defining characteristics is the strength.

A culture that values the pursuit of knowledge, curiosity, and an honest assessment of the frontiers of life will acquire new talent from its children, its neighbors, trade partners, and even its enemies. But this does not require the physical importation.

Setting aside the obvious perils and dubious legitimacy of empires, the British had curry long before they were suddenly for no reason at all ruled by it.

With all of the "free trade" and "open markets" and other globo-capital promises, as well as the greatest technology ever for instant communication and transfer of knowledge, somehow Our Economy relies upon the importation of the rest of the world's talent inside our shores. Every year, every advancement somehow requires moar exogenous inputs. Curious.

So, are we an Economy, a Standard of Living, some other matrix of metrics reflecting various comforts?

Or are we a Nation of People, to serve that People? Or better, a Confederacy of Sovereign Nation-States that voluntarily unify for mutually beneficial purposes while retaining their unique lands and peoples' way of life?

There is a presumed moral righteousness of this importation as well. When, in fact, it is morally wrong to build and support a system that exports cultural garbage and decay and military expeditions while importing the talented minorities from the rest of the world and then harboring them with pearls and status, much like it strip mines natural resources while retaining all of the financial assets elsewhere.

A moral system would cultivate its neighbors by exporting its own talents and knowledge and importing ideas and materials in fair trades that would build up both nations.

I know, how utopian. But because this scenario fails under the reality of human nature in a fallen world does not mean the moral indictment above is not true. In fact, it suggests that it is even more dangerous to elevate the morality of commerce above all else.

There is no need for a culture to be a turnstile or a destination for talented Dreamers to build a "better life" for the rest of the world unless the goal is to pursue a population of global homogenization.

Diversity of talent is a function of God's blessings. A Nation of God's children is perfectly able to live according to their talents alone. Unless the higher god is indeed wealth. In which case, you will reap what you sow. As we are now.

Anyhow, "Diversity" as an antecedent, is a lie. We need to stop using their language. Which validates their premise.

We are individual people, diversity is innate, by definition. I am not my brother. We have the same parents but are wildly different in what we bring to the world. The presupposition of hungry ghost of Diversity is a slippery slope. How much, of what type, on what metric?

There is nothing gained by the presupposition that some group of individuals needs to be importing a constant stream of outside individuals in order to provide a way of life for themselves. A way of life that reflects their values and traditions and maintains a land that is stewarded by that way of life such that their posterity will inherit it all, just as they did by nature of being born by those people.

Import foreign peoples and you import their way of life, traditions, and values. Soon enough all you have is an Economy. And even then one day you wake up and it turns out that the Economy is not yours at all, does not serve you or your people, and is in fact openly hostile to the entire proposition of you and your idea of some Nation.

As for the invader "votes" theory, that is also downstream validation of their system. "Elections" no longer require replacing physical voters. Your harder answer is the one. It is a literal replacement, physically, because

Expand full comment