Any invasion should be met with fire and sword, that's the long and short of it. Never before have the 'rulers' of a nation deliberately brought in replacements for their own people, and this is particularly foul because the invaders are not even of our species or religion. Kings and nobles died on the field of battle to preserve their nations, our lickspittles open the gates for the filth.

Expand full comment

“Unlike some who look at God’s strategy as punishment or reward, I don’t recognize it as such. God’s purposes are simply that, what suits Him for His purposes, not Man’s. We’re pawns in the hands of the Great Strategist.”

Well said. Soli Deo Gloria.

Expand full comment
Sep 9Liked by T.L. Davis

I am very puzzled by not knowing the power of five.

What is the context? Can anyone help me understand?

I agree with Gabby Mouse, yes the goal should be to protect our

borders, but it seems the goal is the opposite. What is the purpose of the inaction?

Is it revenge for USA misdeeds? Is it to purposely slaughter all whites? Who will be

profiting from that plan? Help.

Expand full comment
Sep 10Liked by T.L. Davis

If you hire someone to do a job for you and they then refuse to do that job, it is up to you to get the job done some other way even if its you, yourself, who must do it. It serves no purpose just complaining about the contractor to others while the job goes undone and you make no effort to employ other alternatives or do the job yourself. We hired those clucks to oversee and complete various jobs for us when we voted them into public office, including our national security, which includes a secure border. They in turn delegated to others, (appointees), to carry out various functions within each elector's responsibilities to meet the expectation voters have of them. Well, they aren't doing the job we hired them to do, are they! The job remains... to secure our border and then roundup and toss the barbarians out. Every one of them! But those we hired tell us that we can't do that ourselves and they won't do it, either. We can't defend ourselves, our families, our communities, our nation. We must do as we are told they say, and sit and watch everything we love be altered beyond recognition and ultimately destroyed. We have options, but employing them is with great challenges and also great risk. It would truly be 'crossing the Rubicon' with no going back.

Expand full comment

I encourage this Author to keep writing... if not for anyone but himself... which is the way I think many writers end up thinking at the end of each sentence. I know I do. However, I read every word of every essay this guy writes. He is BRILLIANT and I am far from the only person that knows that!!

If you have any question of my statement... read "Nine Principles of Freedom." Get it at https://twelveround.com/books. That book is the most concise and focused work with the least words written in layman terms I have ever read. I should be part of every students reading. May The Great One permit me the time to read T.L.’s other books.

Americans... and I mean those who believe in the Freedom of Individual Rights, Free Enterprise and Equality... that equality free of influence of race, creed, religion, belief, ethnicity and that equality driven and measured ONLY by decency, ethical ambition and capability... will prevail over this onslaught against those rights of Freedom I state in this paragraph.

Nothing can defeat each and every person born... who by nature strives for those rights... the desire of those rights being in each person's DNA. Those Freedoms may be suppressed, but the only way to conquer and destroy that desire will be to kill each human opposed to those who want to totally control. And then another wave of people will be born... again and again and again. Freedom is in our Souls… and will always be.

Jack Lawson

Member, Sully H. deFontaine Special Forces Association Chapter 51, Las Vegas, Nevada

Author of the “Civil Defense Manual,” “The Slaver’s Wheel,” “A Failure of Civility,” “And We Hide From The Devil” and “In Defense.”

“When an animal calls out a warning of danger unseen to other animals, the others don’t question the motive as their instincts are still intact. When a human tries to warn his kind, they laugh and call him a conspiracy theorist, because their instincts have been rendered useless.”

“Any species that does not have the instinct of survival, that cannot or will not defend themselves, is doomed to extinction… as time has shown.” Author Jack Lawson

From Jack Lawson… an American in 1RLI Support Commando and attached to Rhodesian “C Squadron” SAS Africa 1976-79

Expand full comment